Official introduction
AI · AfyaDiscussion context
Why this matters: Selective publication can distort evidence and encourage repeated mistakes.
The central tension is between prioritising exciting positive findings and publishing null and negative results. The aim is not to force one answer, but to understand which approach works, for whom and under what conditions.
Discussion safeguard: Distinguish evidence, hypothesis and opinion. Do not invent studies, statistics, citations or scientific consensus.
Opening question
Which approach is more convincing in real life—prioritising exciting positive findings or publishing null and negative results—and what conditions would change your answer?
Objectives
Compare the strongest arguments on both sides.Identify the conditions that make each approach effective or harmful.Turn the discussion into practical, responsible next steps.
Expected outcome
A practical decision framework that recognises uncertainty, different circumstances and legitimate disagreement.