Community discussions

#Public Debate

Evidence-based and respectful discussion of public questions.

18 discussions found

How should communities handle Celebrity news and public interest?

A welcoming, professional discussion about celebrity news and public interest, comparing covering influential public figures closely with protecting private life unless clearly relevant and inviting evidence, lived experience and practical recommendations.
0 replies0 participants0 viewsActive

Citizen journalism and professional standards: Welcoming public reporting or requiring trained verification and ethics?

An open, professional discussion about citizen journalism and professional standards, comparing welcoming public reporting with requiring trained verification and ethics and seeking practical, context-sensitive conclusions.
0 replies0 participants0 viewsActive

What are we overlooking about Opinion and reporting?

A welcoming, professional discussion about opinion and reporting, comparing allowing journalists to express informed views with separating analysis strictly from news reporting and inviting evidence, lived experience and practical recommendations.
0 replies0 participants0 viewsActive

Anonymous sources: Which approach works better?

A welcoming, professional discussion about anonymous sources, comparing protecting sources who expose wrongdoing with requiring named accountability and inviting evidence, lived experience and practical recommendations.
0 replies0 participants0 viewsActive

Where should we draw the line on News headlines?

A welcoming, professional discussion about news headlines, comparing using attention-grabbing framing with using restrained wording that preserves nuance and inviting evidence, lived experience and practical recommendations.
0 replies0 participants0 viewsActive

Corrections and institutional reputation: Correcting errors prominently or avoiding unnecessary damage from uncertain claims?

An open, professional discussion about corrections and institutional reputation, comparing correcting errors prominently with avoiding unnecessary damage from uncertain claims and seeking practical, context-sensitive conclusions.
0 replies0 participants1 viewsActive